Why insurers are looking to outsource private debt

William Nicoll, Head of Institutional Fixed Income, M&G Investments explains why more insurers are outsourcing.

Merger

Insurance Investor: What does the scenario for insurers outsourcing asset management look like at the moment? Is there an increase in outsourcing or are the majority of assets still being run in house?

William Nicoll: We have seen more private equity money going into the insurance sector, so you have seen some smaller insurance companies being set up which means there are probably more insurance companies seeking assets than previously.

It is normal and sensible for smaller insurance companies not to try to manage all their assets internally because of the scale required to do so efficiently.

"It is normal and sensible for smaller insurance companies
not to try to manage all their assets internally."

It comes down to a cost discussion which states that if you are below a certain size or you are a niche player then it is probably not worth the significant investment in having an all-singing, all- dancing asset management group and therefore you will outsource certain elements.

Also, most of the big insurance companies know that they can't do everything perfectly. There are going to be specialisms and interesting assets that their asset manager won't, normally for historic reasons, have exactly the right set up or expertise to be able to access.

II: What are the most popular asset classes that are usually outsourced?

William: Private debt is where we have seen growth over the past few years which comes from the fact that Solvency II means that insurance companies have different requirements from other investors in the market.

Due to these regulations, in many cases it is challenging for an insurance company to source and invest in the perfect assets on their own.

There are capital efficient investments for insurance companies that possibly won't work for pension schemes and vice versa.

"Private debt is where we have seen growth over the past
few years because of Solvency II."

This is an opportunity for asset managers who may be able, for instance, to fund a private infrastructure deal, where 60-70 per cent of it is a perfect asset for the insurance company with the remaining 30-40 per cent working well for a pension scheme.

Therefore, you would require both client bases to make the transaction possible.

This again means that if you are an insurance company investing only your own money, you might be limited in what you can invest in because some transactions are only possible if there is demand for 100 per cent of the deal.

It can be difficult to find another party to take the remaining 30-40 per cent which doesn’t suit the requirements of your insurance portfolio.

"If you are an insurance company investing only your own money,
you might be limited in what you can invest in."

It is likely that an insurance company would use a bank in this scenario, which could be expensive, or they could come to an asset manager, such as us, who has both of the required client bases and can therefore distribute the assets to the most appropriate investors.

It is possible that, private equity ownership in the insurance sector results in shorter timeframes than the 10-20 years that would be required to build a complete asset management business.

So, the trend of outsourcing and working closely with asset managers is set to continue.

II: Where do investment consultants come in in all this, in a relationship between an insurer and a fund manager?

William: The difficulty for any fund manager is knowing that you may have the intellectual answer i.e. you may want to fund a £2 billion project and have existing clients seeking £1 billion of it, but not know who would be appropriate for other half of it.

Consultants - with their larger map of the investor market and their deep understanding of what their clients need - should be able to act as a matchmaker and help the markets be more efficient.


For Investment Professionals only

This document reflects M&G’s present opinions reflecting current market conditions. They are subject to change without notice and involve a number of assumptions which may not prove valid. Past performance is not a guide to future performance. The distribution of this document does not constitute an offer or solicitation. It has been written for informational and educational purposes only and should not be considered as investment advice or as a recommendation of any security, strategy or investment product. Reference in this document to individual companies is included solely for the purpose of illustration and should not be construed as a recommendation to buy or sell the same.  Information given in this document has been obtained from, or based upon, sources believed by us to be reliable and accurate although M&G does not accept liability for the accuracy of the contents.

The services and products provided by M&G Investment Management Limited are available only to investors who come within the category of the Professional Client as defined in the Financial Conduct Authority’s Handbook.

Issued by M&G Investment Management Limited (unless stated otherwise), registered in England and Wales under number 936683 with its registered office at 10 Fenchurch Avenue, London EC3M 5AG. M&G Investment Management Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority.